Camilla Parker Bowles |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
Guests
Guest |
Topic: Camilla Parker Bowles Posted: 22 February 2005 at 12:16pm |
That is one ugly bird. You would think a Prince should be able to get himself a top bit of totty, wouldn't you ?
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
Malc London
Chalfont Snapper Joined: 11 January 2005 Status: Offline Points: 8490 |
Posted: 22 February 2005 at 12:19pm |
I don't think she was so bad when she was younger. She must have something if he preferred her to Princess Diana.
|
|
Guests
Guest |
Posted: 22 February 2005 at 12:20pm |
Diana was a bit of a fruitcake though. Maybe Camilla performs her bedroom duties well but the thought turns my stomach.
|
|
big baggles
Chalfont Snapper Joined: 11 January 2005 Status: Offline Points: 7320 |
Posted: 22 February 2005 at 12:50pm |
diana may have been a fruitcake but she was definately easier on the eye....camilla is an odd looking woman, but at the end of the day its charles who has to look at her every morning not us, let em get on with it.... who cares anyway...
IMO -they are just another pair of nutters in the limelight entering into second marraiges... Edited by big baggles |
|
need a stella and i need one now !
|
|
Rich Kid
Chalfont Snapper Joined: 11 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 626 |
Posted: 22 February 2005 at 1:20pm |
I think Charles loves Camilla in her dominatrix outfit. Royal males have a history of adoring strong dominant women!
|
|
Fivelive
Villager Joined: 11 February 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 128 |
Posted: 22 February 2005 at 2:05pm |
Bloody royal family shouldn't impact on our lives at
all... they should live in small huts and ride bikes like they do in normal European countries. What should it matter to us who Charlie marries? It's all an attempt to divert public attention from the fact that Charles has just been caught stealing millions from the public coffers. |
|
DanW
Chalfont Admin Joined: 11 January 2005 Status: Offline Points: 11988 |
Posted: 22 February 2005 at 2:06pm |
And proof required here methinks. |
|
Fivelive
Villager Joined: 11 February 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 128 |
Posted: 22 February 2005 at 2:14pm |
Loadsa publicity just before the marriage
announcement, Charles' secretary/creative accountant was interrogated by a parliamentary committee.. front page stuff in the decent papers until the marriage story came up. I can get you the cuttings... |
|
DanW
Chalfont Admin Joined: 11 January 2005 Status: Offline Points: 11988 |
Posted: 22 February 2005 at 2:20pm |
It is not 'fact' Neal! "Labour MP Gerry Steinberg accused advisers of a move to give the Prince access to money he is not supposed to be able to touch." Accusation is not proof. BBC story http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4242213.stm MPs giving Charlie a hard time - people in glass houses..... |
|
Rich Kid
Chalfont Snapper Joined: 11 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 626 |
Posted: 22 February 2005 at 2:29pm |
Its time we grew up and woke up to the fact that its the 21st century
and that we don't need Queens, Princes, Castles, and all the other
fairy-tale jiggery-pokkery.
Let Charles & Camilla marry as ordinary people without all this fuss. We need to live in a full democracy, not a half-way house. We should elect our President and our second chamber, and have a written constitution like most civilised nations. |
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |