Forum Home Forum Home > Chalfont St Peter > News and Gossip
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Tescos Tunnel Collapse
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Topic ClosedTescos Tunnel Collapse

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 525354
Author
Message
TRACKWORKER View Drop Down
Local
Local


Joined: 25 September 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 92
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 February 2006 at 8:58pm

Another quote from SBFPress

Council accused over Tesco store

The Tesco tunnel at Gerrards Cross
  • The Tesco tunnel at Gerrards Cross
  • PEOPLE from Gerrards Cross accused county councillors of not listening, after members agreed Tesco could continue to bring in building materials by rail for its new store over the railway line near Gerrards Cross station.

    The Tesco project had brought them misery, villagers said. They were living on a building site; things were intolerable; and there was no end in sight .

    Work on the store came to a halt in June, when the tunnel being built over the Chiltern Line at Gerrards Cross, on top of which the Tesco store would be built, collapsed.

    Villagers who had never wanted the new store in the first place, hoped this would be the end of the project.

    Work has still not re-started because Network Rail has to give the work the all clear.

    The delay meant the seven month planning permission given by the county council to Tesco, allowing the company to bring construction materials to the building site via a rail siding, ran out in August.

    On Tuesday members of Buckinghamshire County Council's development control committee agreed to give the company another year from the date building work started again. And they said the company had to be off this bit of the line by June 2007.

    About 40 villagers and one Tesco representative turned up to hear the debate.

    Ros Hurn said the committee had had hundreds of letters, and petitions.

    "By approving this you would be flying in the face of your responsibility to local democracy. I urge you to reject this application." she said.

    Peter Chapman, chairman of Gerrards Cross Parish Council, said the company should be asked to resubmit the application when it knew work would be starting again.

    Local councillor and committee member Peter Hardy proposed that the matter should be deferred.

    Councillors were sympathetic. The planning application for the store got through on appeal after South Bucks District Council failed to decide in the time allowed.

    But planning officer David Pickard said the current application was nothing to do with whether the store should have been given permission.

    And he warned that, if members turned Tesco down, the company could bring in building materials by local roads direct to the construction site instead of by rail. The county council had no control over the construction site.

    Tesco's corporate affairs manager, Katherine Edwards, said Tesco wanted to get on with things.

    "We are extremely sorry about this and well aware of the inconvenience to local people."

    Committee member Richard Pushman said: "We have to face the fact that the Tesco site is not going to go away. They have permission and will go ahead. We have to make the best of a bad job."

    A Network Rail spokesman said she had no idea when these solutions would come forward, but Network Rail and the Health and Safety Executive had to be sure they were safe.

     

    Unquote:

    The very last sentence implies the tunnel is NOT safe??!!!

     

     

     

    Back to Top
    Sponsored Links


    Back to Top
    TRACKWORKER View Drop Down
    Local
    Local


    Joined: 25 September 2005
    Location: United Kingdom
    Status: Offline
    Points: 92
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 February 2006 at 9:02pm

    The KEY sentence in the article above is

    Work has still not re-started because Network Rail has to give the work the all clear.

     

    That be so,WHY THE HELL DID NETWORK RAIL GREEN LIGHT THE REOPENING OF THE TUNNEL????!!!

    Back to Top
    Guests View Drop Down
    Guest
    Guest
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 February 2006 at 9:02pm
    Originally posted by TRACKWORKER TRACKWORKER wrote:

    ADAMANT that I am the author of the above website,

    where have i said that?

    Originally posted by TRACKWORKER TRACKWORKER wrote:

    Give me a break Rob, I am NOT the author and neither is Mr Drysdale.

    but you are mr Alan Drysdale, if you are not, tell me why have you been answering questions directed at Alan Drysdale?

    Originally posted by TRACKWORKER TRACKWORKER wrote:

    Trackworker not as daft as you thought???!!!

    er, no more like the opposite actually.

    Back to Top
    TRACKWORKER View Drop Down
    Local
    Local


    Joined: 25 September 2005
    Location: United Kingdom
    Status: Offline
    Points: 92
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 February 2006 at 6:50am

    So Rob Cunliffe thinks Trackworkeris crazier than 1st anticipated, great now get of my back.I STILL think the tunnel collpase  was caused by complicity and industrial fraud.

     

    I suppose Rob Cumliffe thinks ALL the punters who share my concerns for the GXT are also bonkers.

     

    Trackwroker a.k.a lan Drysdale.

    Rob Cuncliffe is such a good sleuth.Shame he doesn't use his detective nose for sniffing out crap cement??!!

    Back to Top
    DanW View Drop Down
    Chalfont Admin
    Chalfont Admin
    Avatar

    Joined: 11 January 2005
    Status: Offline
    Points: 11988
    Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 February 2006 at 8:49am
    Thread closed. You can start another one when you both learn to behave.
    I used to be with it. But then they changed what it was. Now what I'm with isn't it, and what's it seems scary and weird.
    Back to Top
     Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 525354

    Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

    Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06
    Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd.