SENSE

Thank you for cutting in, I was beginning to struggle with my own composure there for a while
A great forum by the way, it's great to have somewhere to discuss the future of our village.

"It has been the implied message ever since your campaign started."

I repeat, show me where we have said that we will be inundated with migrants!

IMPLIED!!!

Show me where we have "implied" that we will be inundated by migrants.

You can't.

We have maintained our campaign all along attacking the numbers, density, and apportionment, your attacks are the only place where migrants have been mentioned.

"Well, seeing as you refuse to provide the evidence of your claims, what can anyone infer from your responses?"

I have given you all the proof you need for all the facts, yet you do not read or acknowledge any of it, you just continue saying that I have not supplied you with proof. This shows how unreasonable you are.

I am sure that there some more people who would mistakenly think that 600 more houses in our village would be a good thing. But you are the only argumentative, rude obtuse little man in our village.


We have declared many many times that we would welcome 100-120 new homes at the Holy Cross site. READ OUR LITERATURE YOU SILLY MAN! Stop making false claims about us. If you can show where we have said this then please demonstrate - you can't.


These figures are once again in the Draft Core Strategy, that big book that you haven't read that is at the centre of this whole row.

"But it will more than likely take a lot longer than that for these and other homes to be occupied. Or do you know differently? Plenty of time for you to work with the service providers to improve the infrastructure."

In your deluded mind, do you really think that the Council will wait years to fill up these houses when there is such a nationwide shortfall. Get real!

"... there seems to be no dialogue from you, to work with the District Council in order to help resolve this issue. You would rather work on the basis that the housing development will not go ahead, so therefore you will not compromise on accepting that it will."

We have been consistently asking CDC and Bucks to meet with us and our planning consultant, it is a matter of much contention, it is they who refuse to meet us - it is their duty as elected public servants to hear our concerns, yet they will still will not meet with us. It is the dogma that surrounds CDC that has caused a stalemate, we have tried very hard to resolve our differences and come to a compromise, but if they refuse to meet us we have to stand our ground.

"But they are not lies, are they? You know my assertions are based in truth, this is why you cannot produce the evidence to refute it."

As I have proved several times, they are fabrications and lies, you do not know the facts, you do not know what we represent, you don't even know what CDC represent, you are completely detached from the reality.


Edited by SENSE - 07 July 2010 at 9:12am

SENSE wrote: Flyboy, please can you be so kind as to point out where we have said that we will be overrun by migrants?

Flyboy, please can you be so kind as to point out where we have said that we will be overrun by migrants?

Your quality of argument is so thin that you have to resort to lying and making things up about us.
This is paramount to playground politics.
You are obviously a habitual liar, even your story about overhearing a conversation on Feast Day is fabricated, it was you who was being rude to my colleague, you don't even have the guts to own up to it - how very sad!

I really must apologise to other members of this forum, I am growing weary of defending SENSE from these unnecessary barrages.

This man keeps quoting nonsense about us, when it is clear he has no idea about what we represent, he hasn't read any of our material, he is just making it all up and ranting away like a self proclaimed modern day Robin Hood standing up for the poor people against the evil greedy local action group. I do not have the time to retort everything he says, he is painting a picture that we are hypocritical, xenophobic, liars with secret agenda when we simply want a fair distribution of housing in our district.

We are being dumped on by CDC, as is Little Chalfont, we do not have the infrastructure to cope. CDC have taken the easy option and have allocated a heavy distribution of housing to CSP, when towns that have their own transport links into London, better road networks, better education and health facilites with infrastructures to suit are getting away with significantly less proportions. We all know the figures and they speak for themselves.

Where will all of the less advantaged people in Great Missenden, Heath End and Prestwood find low cost housing when it is all destined for CSP? We will see a net increase of 10% housing within 2-3 years, how could we possibly cope with that influx of humanity when our infrastructure has not been afforded similar increases, when our schools have not been expanded to cope, when we don't have local employment opportunities or decent transport links and when our gridlocked roads are being constrained still further? This is not good town planning, CDC simply don't care what happens in CSP, they see us as a worthwhile sacrifice to hide their poor social housing performance. It just doesn't make sense.

... and why is this ridiculous man challenging our sound logic?

I'm afraid I am away for a while, I expect to return to pages and pages of more schoolboy lies.


Edited by SENSE - 07 July 2010 at 12:17am

Seeing as we are not as overrun with migrants as SENSE is trying to make us believe, I would imagine that out here, we are balancing the average. By which I mean that the fertility rate for this area is much less than it is for say, London, Manchester or Birmingham.